By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Miyamotoo on 27 October 2017
Edit Thread
DonFerrari said:
Miyamotoo said:

Thats my point, its about different prioritys for Sony and Nintendo, 60FPS for R&C would definitely means worse graphics compared to current R&C, Odyssey would probably had 1080p resolution if game is 30 FPS instead of 60 FPS.

Yes many times, around 3x. PS4 is stronger close to 10x than PS3. Ofcourse that Switch games would compared to curent games, but they could do that if they want with fact they failed behind PS4/XB1 games, but they don't because they priorite is on great art style and 60 FPS. If graphics are so important Zelda BotW and Mario Oddysey wouldnt be 97 games.

Nobody said that ever Nintendo games is cartoonish, but most of them are. I mean we had Mortal Kombat that was very photo realistic for tha time even on Sega Genesis.

Again it was about Nintendo priorites.

But point is that RC would also had less details if they went for 60 FPS instead of 30 FPs.

Yes I agree that R&C would have to conceed to have more fps and Odyssey could do HD on 30fps. But that is only a small portion of the graphical IQ on any game.

I doubt it's 3x. PS4 isn't 10x more powerfull, its estimative is around 6x. Ps3 games were around 720p or 540p and that translated to 1080p and 900p for PS4. There is nothing that really suggest 10x power difference, ram and ram velocity isn't power.

Always the "great art style", I love when Nintendo fan pretend that Nintendo art style is so much better than anyone else because the do cartoon instead of trying realism. Still on the cartoon side RC look better. And sorry yo burst that bubble but Nintendo games certainly aren't evaluated as other. If they would evaluate the graphic portion as they do other games they would take a lot of Nintendo scores.

MK isn't Nintendo. And you said they were most, I just showed that at the time they tried to go photorealism on that time limitation.

It doesn't matter, that just one example how they have different priorities.

You can doubt, but fact is that Switch has 8x more RAM memory than PS3, much more capable, newer and much more efficient GPU, and similar is for CPU also, at end Switch is around 3x stronger. I mean thats why we have some 1080p games on Switch they were 720p on PS3. Its not point only about resolution, 1080p games on PS4 have more details, better textures, better lightning, shadows, other effects...and better and more stable FPS compared to PS3 games. PS4 has 16x more RAM memory than PS3, it has around 8x stronger GPU just buy numbers (with difference in tech/architecture real time difference is easily bigger than 10x), similar goes for CPU, PS4 CPU is much more capable, newer and much more efficient for modern games than Cell in PS3, so at end, difrence is closer to 10x.

I dont think that people thinking that Nintendo art style is so much better than else than anyone else, but Nintendo games usualy have great art style. That's like your opinion that RC look better, thats very subjective, while its fact that Nintendo games play better beacuse 60 fps. I disagree that Nintendo games certainly aren't evaluated as other, just look Zelda BotW and Mario Odyssey, that's huge leap in evolution, point that on technical side are not like other current games, dont change nothing (I mean just look reviews for both games).

I didn't said that MK is Nintendo, my point is that even back than we had some more realistic games while Nintendo were making more cartonie games same like today. Again, nobody said that evry Nintendo game is cartoonish, but most of them are.

Last edited by Miyamotoo - on 27 October 2017