Why doesn't Nintendo make a game that looks like Uncharted 2/3??

[AngryLittleAlchemist]

StarDoor said:

AngryLittleAlchemist said:

And yet, you don't provide any counter arguments!

If you're going to say Breath of the Wild, then yes, that is the exception. Since we don't see many games with that art style. 

If you're going  to say that photorealism is more common than cartoony art styles, then i'd argue the latter is only growing with time in popularity.

It's seriously getting tiring having you make comments like you have a checkboard next to you of "gotcha moments!" . It's almost like your presence on this forum is just to belittle people's arguments

Especially since people can make stupid argument somtimes. That's fine. You can't realize how stupid an argument is until someone explains to you why it's stupid, unless you already believe it to be stupid. The problem with Cerebralbore is that all his arguments are as such, stupid. 

Seeing as how you brought up Breath of the Wild on your own, you probably already know what the issue is.

You said, in literal terms, that every Nintendo game on Switch has the same art style, to the point of being like Call of Duty.

Do you really believe that? I've seen plenty of people who say that all photorealistic games look the same, but this might be the first time I've seen someone say that all cartoony games look the same.

Breath of the Wild, Splatoon 2, and Super Mario Odyssey all look quite different from one another, just like how Horizon Zero Dawn, Doom, and Uncharted all have distinct looks. Nobody can look at any of these games and mistake it for another cartoony/realistic game.

You don't have to assert that all Nintendo games look the same just to make an argument that they should branch out and make something photorealistic.

Your right. That was a bad argument on my part and I don't really believe it. I'm sorry.