By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Shaunodon said:
GhaudePhaede010 said:

1) Wii U has enough games that justify the hardware. You cannot have it both ways. You cannot say it was horrible but has great games. A console is defined by its games. Also, 3DS is not a horrible piece of hardware so you can still buy the game there. And you are done.

2) Everyone can wait. Smash is only 3 years old. You literally are asking for a port of a game that is on 2 consoles already in less than a generation cycle. It causes fatigue for the next Smash title. I have a Wii U and a 3DS and a Switch and I am saying I do not want it. So, not everyone agrees. But I do not think anyone would argue with a brand new Smash title over a Smash 4 remake. You guys are getting complacent and your expectations need to be raised. It is depressing watching a community that says too many ports are bad literally have a list of nothing but ports for Switch. I want new games. If I wanted Wii U or 3DS games, I would buy them on Wii U or 3DS.

 

Note: not all ports are bad. I am not saying there should never be any ports at all. I am saying can the community do a better job of handling their, "immediate gratification" emotions and demand a new game once in a while?

We've gotten a new Zelda, Splatoon, 3D Mario and Xenoblade this year.

I'm not done with Smash 4, a lot of people aren't, and you can't equate the WiiU and 3DS versions. Many people haven't had the chance to play the full version, or any version at all. As you said, Smash 4 is only 3 years old, and it still has a lot of life left in it.

Just because a few of you are done with the game doesn't mean everyone else is.

Also not sure why you're trying to re-write history, but the WiiU's problems are well known by now, and it had nothing to do with a lack of great first-party exclusives. There were many other reasons why people who would've bought those games didn't bother to get a WiiU.

1) So?

2) Many people? Smash 4 sold 14 million units. It is the second best selling game in the franchise upon my last check (could be the best selling... I am not going to check right now). It is the second best selling fighting game in history upon last check (again that could have changed but I am not going to check). I would say a lot of people played the title. I would argue the audience that wanted to play the title has the title somewhere.

3) I only argued that it is not universally agreed upon.

4) I did not rewrite Wii U's history. I said a console is quantified by its games. Wii U has good games? Then the console is worth purchasing. That is not revisionist history; rather, that is the fact. Dreamcast has about 15 good titles so guess what, I bought one and those titles. If there are enough good games to justify buying the console, buy the console. You cannot have it both ways. Annnnnnddddddd this is you completely ignorning the fact that the game is on 3DS because that really hurts your argument. You see, even if you say Wii U was trash and subsequently the Wii U's version of Smash 4 was trash, the 3DS version still exists and people played it there, too. And since 3DS is a great console with decent tech, many games, and most of all good sales, your argument is finished.



01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01001001 01111001 01101111 01101100 01100001 01101000 00100001 00100000 01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01000101 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101001 01110100 01111001 00100001 00100000