By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Machiavellian on 19 October 2017
Edit Thread
DonFerrari said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

You already said you'd never rate a GT game below a 10, and that was before the game was even out and you could play the final version. It's not trolling to not blindly give a game a great score just because of its name.

Yes the 8 GTs (coming Prologue) I played I wouldn't give below than 10, because that is my personal evaluation. And there is quite a big room of maneuvering between 8 and 10 isn't there?

I have played the GTS beta and on it I could recognize all that I needed and that granted the 10 (played over 10h) on its premisse. It's far from being my favourite or having all I want, but it is even farther from being a bad game that should get lower than 8. Judging the game for what it have it is over 8 without any question and reviewers looking for what the game is and what is important on the game have done good reviews.

Machiavellian said:

Not sure about that.  Reading the forums there are a lot of people feeling the review did not cover a lot of stuff missing from the game that they enjoyed with the previous series.  When all is said and done, people just do not like paying 60 bones for a pretty much MP only game.

Except I was talking about the reviewers for the game.

I saw the backlash on this forum, yt and even PD page about the changes, and I understand people that miss those, because I also like all that GT had. I was very happy with GT5 and 6, while a lot of people were bitching exactly about the excessive cars, standard models, easy championships, etc.

People do not? Is Splatoon doing bad? Is CoD doing bad? Is Titanfall doing bad?

The demo alone took me 10h (with only 1 or 2h on MP), estimatives put the SP portion of GTS on 50-100h to gold all. So there is plenty of SP content compared to most games (majority have less than 12h, some even only 4h, campaigns).

I'm not happy with the focus being majorly online, but PD was clear that this GT would focus on this and not the SP. So would you pick overwatch and give take half the score because there is no SP? The game have to be evaluate by what it have and proposed to do, not by what you wish it have. Because if it was to be ranked on wish anyone could give a 2 to any game say what they wish and call it fair.

Machiavellian said:

I consider this a very dismissive comment.  Anytime users are not happy they have to have some type of agenda or be for the competition.  I am pretty positive that this probably only make about 1% of the reviews or less.  There is a lot of people not happy with the MP focus.  That does not mean GT Sport is a bad game, its just not the game they were expecting.  I agree that the game should be graded on it's merits but should also pointed out for the lack of modes that were part of the other series so people can make an informed decision.  I personally do not care about that much about a particular grade but instead care if the game has the things in it that make it fun for me.  This current iteration of GT does not but then again I can easily wait to see if they updated.  Not being tied to any one system, I have enough games to fill the void until GT Sport get a better SP that I can enjoy.

He is talking about the 0-4 scores probably, there is no way a score in this section isn't trolling or agenda driven.

And people were informed of it for over 2 years PD have been touting the focus on MP.

I am saying just because there are low scores do not mean they are from fans of another series.  I am saying those type of scores probably make up 1% of those low scores.

The games you listed, Splattoon, COD and Titanfall, did not have the years like GT outside of COD and COD always has a SP component so not sure why they are included in your list.  I believe Splattoon has a SP now doesn't it and so does Titanfall 2.