By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nuvendil said:
DonFerrari said:

And I like that all your explaning brings comparison on the use of killing it, showing that implicitly the term does comparison.

But I'm fine with you using it as just meaning Switch is doing good. But you can't deny that some in the thread were using it straight on the doing much better than PS4.

And considering the context that were brought Switch winning 6 and PS4 2, but on sum PS4 being ahead than Switch can't make any comparison based on pure numbers totally Switch winning because, perhaps by end of year it will.

Excellence is always somewhate relative.  A console selling this well is killing it.  If the Iphone was selling these numbers it would be an unmitigated catastrophe on an unprecedented scale.  

But no, the first statement of someone saying it was "killing it" was just that, it was great.  Then someone swooped in and said it couldn't be killing it because it wasn't beating PS4 enough.  Ignoring that said person never meant the PS4 was getting destroyed but the Switch was doing great.  The PS4 happening to be the metric was happenstance.  If Xbone were the one dominating, it would be Xbone.  If 3DS was outselling the two, it would be that.  

Selling this well but close to the other... so Is PS4 also killing it? If it is then it is both are killing



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."