tbone51 said:
Why cuz it lost? Switch wasnt that bad with supply, maybe both did good? |
apparently being the best year of PS4 is a weak performance.
Nuvendil said:
As I just said in the other thread, PS4 being the metric is totally irrelevant and inevitable since we have no numbers. The Switch is killing it because it is going toe to toe with the PS4 which is a sales machine in its peak year. The PS4 is the METRIC. It is not the object of the phrase "killing it", that isn't what the phrase means. That's straight up not how you use it. |
Ok, won't keep talking about it as if no one can see the intent of putting both together and use specific words.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
