By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
John2290 said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

That .... doesn't even make sense. How did you get that conclusion? I never said anything of the sort.

No it wasn't. People overhyped what was a game that didn't need to be overhyped. It was a great game and it proved that in it's quality, sadly people overstated how good it was till it became nothing but a sentiment. Of course the Last of Us is great, everyone else thinks so, so you should too! That's the mentality people gave the game, which is the same reason why it took so long for Ocarina of Time to get criticized. But hey, at least that fanbase can take the criticism.

That's exactly what you said. If you're rating games on pure subjectivity and not any objective analysis then you'd a broken game that for some reason you alone love to play can be rated a 10 without any subtraction for its faults. Load of nonsense. You are devils advocate in almost any post I've seen from you on theis site anyway. with little room to change your opnion if at all, so there is no point in going around in circular arguments with you. 

I agree reviews should be about subjectivity even though more technical features can be evaluated in more objective terms, but the whole point of subtracting points to the overall score doens't hold up beacuse ideally if reviews were really subjective you wouldn't have a score in the first place since there's no point in using an objective scale to value subjective attributes.