| John2290 said: |
"That's exactly what you said. "
No it was not. It was not even close.
"If you're rating games on pure subjectivity and not any objective analysis then you'd a broken game that for some reason you alone love to play can be rated a 10 without any subtraction for its faults. Load of nonsense."
No you wouldn't. If a game is broken and you don't enjoy the game because it's broken(a.k.a. a majority of people) you would give the game a lower score. You're acting like a majority of people would see game breaking glitches and think "Wow, fun!" or "Oh, who cares i'll ignore it" if objectivity didn't exist. But they wouldn't, would they? They'd review the game, and give it a lower score because those bugs personally affected their enjoyment of the product.
"You are devils advocate in almost any post I've seen from you on theis site anyway."
Not only does this sentence fail, but I don't think you know what devil's advocate means.
" with little room to change your opnion if at all, so there is no point in going around in circular arguments with you."
And you've changed your opinion when?
It's so funny to me that you started a discussion, made a fallacy and a false conclusion, I wrote calm respectful replies and yet you still get angry for no reason and say "I'm not going to have this circular argument with you!" Really? We weren't even getting to the meat of the discussion that YOU started and you don't have the balls to continue? My responses have been tame analysis of your, honestly, very shitty comments and for you to throw your arms up in the air for no reason is nonsense. What caused you to all the sudden be like "This is just a circular argument!" So far you haven't actually addressed nearly any of my claims properly. Damn, are you just the biggest Last of Us fanboy or do you randomly leave discussions all the time for no reason at the very start? This progression of the series of events is honestly just confusing.
