By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
darkenergy said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

How is it irrelevant? It shows an absirdly large bias on your part. Unless, you are saying it is irrelevant because you already acknowledge the lunacy of your defending? 

How is stating FH3 selling 2.5 million by the end of 2016 bias since that was confirmed? Vgchartz still has it under 2 million.He is clearly not taking digital into consideration.

I would keep going on why you ask a pointless question to me but naw don't want to waste my time on you.

You wouldn't want to waste your time on me but you respond to a 6 day old conversation? Rich.

Don't play dumb. Stating a fact isn't a bias. Defending a company multiple, multiple times for pretty much no reason on many threads? ... Yeah, that kinda is what i'd call an insane bias.