CrazyGamer2017 said:
You don't see a point for such a law or you don't want to see a point for such a law? I just made the point for that law so you see it but you don't want that law implemented. And if you don't want a law that protects people by going against predators, you are by definition defending them. As for my crazy notion of law that defends what I think is right? Ok, so defending victims of scalpers is wrong? it's crazy? it's only my view? But then you admit in that last line that yes hardcore drugs should be legal and tobacco companies should be allowed to sell to kids. So with a moral compass that far from north, I don't know what to say anymore. If you think laws should not protect people then, yeah, all is said here. We've made our points and they are forever divergent but our poins are made. |
I don't see the point in the law, I'm very against government control. So you want people to be protected from their own stupidity? They will always find ways to be stupid. And please doesn't try such a lowly falacy of saying if someone isn't positive about creating laws against something they are suportive of it.
My moral compass is that I would never use drugs, never offer to kids, never harm a kid and I'm against anyone doing it, as much as I'm against abortion. But I'm against laws regulating it because the more you give control for the government the more you end up fucked up.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







