By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
CrazyGamer2017 said:
DonFerrari said:

Thanks god you aren't a congressman, because you would make a law for everything you dislike.

I dislike you defending those scumbags but I would not make a law that says you can't because I believe in free speech. So there goes that argument.

As for a law against scalpers, well I would cause I have this crazy notion that laws should defend the consumer, in this specific case, the weak minded that would fall prey to those "business practices" on top of the smart ones like me that end up not buying a product simply cause all copies were acquired by scalpers. If one would go as far as calling scalping a business practice.

By your reasoning, hardcore drugs should be legal and people should simply say "no" do drug dealers. Tobacco companies should be allowed to advertize cigarettes in schools and it's up to kids and their parents to teach them not to fall for that poison. I could give you a million other examples but I think you get the gist of it.

I'm not defending them and I wouldn't buy from them or be a scalper. But I don't see the point on defending a law against it.

Yes you have a very crazy notion of law, basically a law that defends what you think is right and adapt to your view of justice.

By my reasoning? Yes they should. As much as anyone willing to say company X is being a criminal on its practice without being sued to death.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."