By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
curl-6 said:

While it would've been nice to play TP/SS in 360 graphics and Botw in PS4 graphics, I think that going with weaker hardware was unfortunately necessary for Nintendo; their attempts to be competitive power-wise just weren't working out. 

Going with weaker hardware doesn't change their competitiveness in the slightest or reduce their innovation, you can still have class-leading powerful hardware and still be different from your competitors.
The WiiU had weaker hardware than it's competitors and is also probably one of the largest failures in Nintendo history, power or lack thereof doesn't equate to success.

What it does do is reduce the financial risk upon Nintendo as it's component costs are more easily absorbed by Nintendo and it also allows for larger profit margins.
Even the Switch used older, cheaper and more conservative chips to trend along that line, whilst Maxwell is still pretty competitive, Pascal with higher clocked ULV LPDDR4 could have provided a substantual boost.

With that, there is no point crying over spilt milk, Nintendo has listened to the criticism over power for generations now and has ignored that sentiment and done their own thing anyway. And that's fine.

It's not like it's THAT old. Basically the initial architecture is from 2014, and the updated Switch version is from 2016. Both of which are quite a bit newer, relatively speaking, than the XBOne and PS4. So it's not behind those in that regard.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.