What is a political issue that you want to understand the opposite viewpoint more?

[Aeolus451]

Bandorr said:

Aeolus451 said:

 I answered your questions already. If you can't interpet my answers/position, that's on you. 

I said it over and over. It shouldn't be taxed when it's pass onto to family or a person of their choosing outside of family as inheritence. Is that too difficult to understand? 

It doesn't matter if you or anyone else doesn't think the person who inherited the money has earned it or not because the person who gave the money as inheritance wanted their wealth passed on. It's not a concern of others.

If you have trouble understanding a sentence, wait 1 min after reading it to try absorb it a slower pace so it might sink in. If you still have trouble, rinse and repeat til ya get it. 

Edit. Added in a cherry.

I get it. The questions are too hard for you.  You can't defend your point or explain why money given is money earned. So you resort to desperate attacks and "but I answered it" I understand. I will stop pointing out the glaring holes in arguement.

Sorry to make you feel bad. I get that it feels awkward when you can't answer simple questions and have to resort to "but I did answer" and  "its not my fault" etc.

Desperate attacks? You're the one that started resorting to that and I'm just replying in the same spirit as you. I explained to you that a person who earned their money can give it to someone as inheritance if they want to and it shouldn't be taxed. It's irrelevant if the person who gets the money earned it or not because it was given as inheritance by a person who did. It's that simple. That answers your questions and more. *shrug