Nem said:
Was it for the worse? Doesn't fit your agenda eh? Really, don't care about your agenda on this progressivism you are trying to bring though. This measure is a well intended change and while i think it's trying to jump too far in, it has a good intention and perhaps isn't the best idea. Yet, this by no means supports whatever nonsense you are trying to bring across. |
Again, stop trying to claim trophies for progressivism that it didn't earn. Progressivism as an polititical ideology of today that's "progressive" in name only. It doesn't progress anything forward but rather everything in a circle to the point that often leaves things worse off like in this case.
This recent act of liberal lunancy is not well intended but rather a perfect example of how much thought goes into laws before democrats pass them.








