By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGPolyglot said:
Qwark said:

Under no circumstance (except for war or prevention of mass slaughter and self defense from mortal danger) should a civilian ever fire a gun at another human being. Even if they are bullied or have less rights than a heterosexual. Not being able to marry or having to go into a certain toilet is not equal to any of those situations. With many governmenta I assume you imply Russia, Eastern Europe and other countries where bring LBQT+ isn't being penalised.

They face hate crimes more extreme than that. And I don't just mean those places, I also mean the United States, as we are talking about the US specifically here.

Getting punched in the face is not an excuse to shoot someone. Since you are not in mortal danger it just sucks and you can press charges against that individual. You don't need a gun to defend yourself from none life threatening situations and it happens that in countries where people don't have guns they very rarely encounter those.

 

Also against which government employee would one ever be justified of shooting and under what circumstances. Even of a politician has a negative bias against minorities you are not allowed to shoot him. The highest judge would simply prevents his bills like Trump his flight restrictions. So are they allowed to shoot at the police, the only local members certified to keep the peace and arresting people when they commit trials awaiting a fair judgements of their crimes. 



Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar