By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lawlight said:
monocle_layton said:

Yeah. It's as if the infowars whackos don't realize that gun restrictions doesn't mean we want to steal their guns and cause martial law.

 

Maybe (and just fucking maybe) gun violence is insanely high in the US and can be lowered with proper steps. But no, instead every bill brought will be dumbed into 'hurrr liberalz taken my guns abd liburty' and rejected as we enter this cycle when the next mass shooting occurs in 2-4 weeks.

No, I'm talking about the people like these:

Lena Dunham who says that the shooting was about gender and race.

The CBS VP who mocked the people killed because people attending a country music festival must be gun-totting republicans.

Or general silly people saying that the Trump voters deserved it.

Another calling the NRA a terrorist organisation.

In any case, what exactly is your solution?

 

 

 

 

I honestly never care what people say. R/The_Donald is a shitshow after this event, but I never bothered to see what ridiculous claims people can spout

 

The solution was never to simply take all guns. Being smart about WHO we supply our guns to could solve a lot of our issues. My idea is vague, yes, but I never said I magically had the answer to it all.

 

Germany's police force and Japan's gun policies are (in my opinion) very tough, and are the reason why we rarely hear about gun-related incidents over there. More education and more rigid tests to pass would make a significant difference.

 

Would it always work? No, but I'm sure it'd decrease the insane amount of mass shootings the US receives.