By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
irstupid said:
Ganoncrotch said:

Oh yeah, that was another withered looking 60+ year old man as well wasn't it? With his switch blade. Honestly people there is no way that person would have killed the number he did without the weapon he used, even the bomb in the concert in manchester killed far less people.

Also the argument of "maybe he didn't buy the automatic rifle himself because only X amount of people in the US are allowed those guns" okay.... so someone else was able to walk into a store and buy it and then illegally sell it to this person, the chain of the gun getting into this old fuckers hands still doesn't exist in other countries as easily as it does in the US.

Well I've read tha the does have his pilots licenes for a smal plane.

He could do a lot of damage with that. Imagine crashing a small plane into a crowded concert. Or putting a bomb in that plane he crashes.

I don't know the whole no fly zones, but guessing he does and would be able to find a suitable crowded target that would allow him to fly.

Guns or no guns, people bent to doing mass murders will find a way to do it. Just look at all the terrorist attacks in the last few years. I swear only 1 in 10 are gun related at all.

Then why have any laws at all.  In other words, yes someone could always find a way to kill a lot of people but why do they use guns instead, because they are easily obtainable.  The more difficult you make it for someone to obtain guns then they have to go to option B or C or D, each one more difficult to pull off successfully.  Each one more difficult for just the average crazy to do.