potato_hamster said:
I'm sorry, what? Please explain how Sony isn't and Nintendo is. |
Maybe you didn't mean it this way, but the way you phrased that makes it seem like if anything, Nintendo isn't a true gaming company when compared to Sony.
What Darth was trying to say is that Sony's main focus as a company is not on video games. It is not the only product they make, and not what nets them the most profit. Sony cannot truly be defined as a gaming company, given how many other things they do, and how a few of those other things are bigger than their gaming division. Nintendo, on the other hand, devotes most of their resources into games. They almost exclusively deal with games and things related to gaming.
Basically, what Darth said has nothing to do with the quality of the work and just about how these companies operate.
