Is Switch 3rd party support really that impressive?

[GhaudePhaede010]

irstupid said:

GhaudePhaede010 said:

Would you like to list the long list of third party tirple A titles that are on Switch and the problems associated with them?

1) NBA 2K18 has frame rate cut in half, resolution reduced, storage issues.

2) Fifa 18 has missing modes, completely different engine, lesser online experience, plays like a last generation title.

3) DOOM runs at half the frame rate, missing a feature, has storage issues, runs at 720p no matter what, comes out a year and four to five months later.

4) Skyrim is lacking features (all we really know thus far).

5) Lego City Undercover has frame rate issues, graphically downgraded.

6) Ultra Street Fighter II does not offer enough new content, is sold between 1/4 and 1/2 the price on competing consoles.

7) Rocket League runs at 720p no matter what (that is all we really know about the title thus far).

So far, the Switch is in the same position as Wii U but with fewer triple A titles. And in some cases like the game having the same features (2K18) as its counterparts, it offers new issues (storage) to make up for the almost worthy port. I am not saying people should not want these games, I am saying you are completely incorrect when you say Switch games are more complete. They are hurting just as much as Wii U titles were hurting.

I'm talking about legit reasons to be upset. Your bringing in pointless fanboys war reasons. A game being 720p or 900p means nothing to 95% of gamers. Mass Effect 3 costing $60 and releasing when Mass Effect trilogy is released on other consoles also costin gthe same does mean something to gamers. Why the F woudl I buy 1 game when I can get all 3 for same price?

I will give you 2k18, cause I have heard peopel upset about that. But the rest are pitiful quoting that whatever site that does its fps/specs test. digital foundry or something. WHo gives a shit. I hear all teh time online what games have what fps or resolution. If I went home right now and grabbed all of my games, I could not tell you what game has what resolution or fps. I only know those numbers when reading forums online. They mean nothing to me when i'm actually gaming. As they mean nothing to most all gamers. Only thing gamers notice is when there is game breaking bugs or glitchy bugs like in AC Unity or whatever the AC game was that was a horrible release.

Well ain't this post about hypocritical? Clearly Ultra Street Fighter II costing 40 while it is as low as 10 on competing consoles must mean something to gamers, right? Why buy it on Switch for 2 to 4 times as much as on another console? See, same issue, different console.

You do not have to, "give" me anything. Everything I listed is truthful and legitimate. Gamers cared about resolution and frame rate for... ever... I mean Sony vs. Microsoft is the same. However, I think you are missing the point. The point here is the THE EXACT SAME ISSUES FROM WII U HAVE RETURNED! Nothing is new here. These are the same issues that were present in Wii U and they are not going anywhere. The only difference is how the general gaming public feels about it. My list is absolutely fair. I notice that instead of saying, "hey, these are untruthful" you tried to pull the, "who cares" card instead using your personal opinion as evidence. This is not even about who cares. This is not about your personal opinion or experiences. This is about if third party support is actually better or not. Stay topical.

I mean, Fifa 18 is basically Fifa 13 on Wii U all over again. Different, almost last gen engine, lacking modes, lesser online experience... literally, I could be talking about either game and you would not know the difference until I told you which game specifically I was talking about. You have to do better than that.