StarDoor said:
First of all, why would PS4 + Vita versus PS2 be a valid comparison? Secondly, do you think that if Sony had released a hybrid during the seventh generation instead of PSP and PS3, it would have sold 168 million worldwide? Or if Nintendo released a hybrid instead of DS and Wii, it would have sold 255 million worldwide? |
If Sony launched a ps3 that was a hybrid and cost $400 at launch with similar power to the 360 I'd actually think they could have. It's sales would have been insane with the combined userbase and coming off the ps2.
And it would have retained many of the Playstation ps2 exclusives that xbox either nabbed or got a version of. It would have maintained more aswell as it lost franchises like dragon quest and monster hunter to Nintendo.
Dengle was saying why just compare to last gen and I agreed. The gen before it was just the ps2 for Sony so if you were comparing total consoles sold per gen the comparison would be vita + ps4 vs ps2.
| cycycychris said: I hope all you guys get this fight out of you right now in this thread. these petty console war fueled arguments do nothing but ruin the COMG and Media Create threads. They do nothing but drive the community apart and drive new members away. Does it really matter that much to you all that it must be a total war about what the Switch gets compared too. If it bother other member so much that you do one thing, maybe its just time to drop it, hell make your own thread about it if you choose, probably the best solution. But Is it really worth the shit that's been done to this thread. |
I'd like to agree but considering these threads are more popular now then ever before that's actually false.
| the_dengle said: You don’t have to tell me what you are “most interested in.” It’s fully apparent from your posts. |
And you don't have to keep falsely assuming things about me. That's why I feel the need to spell it out for it so you'll stop jumping to conclusions.







