Kasz216 on 11 June 2008
| Words Of Wisdom said: Kasz didn't respond to my post on page 1.  |
didn't see it. Got caught in the end. It seemed odd that you were using it as a point of your arguement since you can't quantify how many points it would get "for being good with nothing" vs how many it would lose for being a sequel.
To me it seems like a net even vs ToV.
