This study doesn't (and really can't) take into effect all of the other variables in playing the game. Obviously all the players aren't equal in terms of skill, and it could very well have been chance that the red teams won more often than the blue.
Also:
"the reason was most likely that the color red may act as a psychological distractor for men, possibly because men flush and turn red when they're angry."
Is that a joke? I honestly can't see how this entire study actually happened now. The whole thing seems way too fake.
And the comment about wearing red in a 1-on-1 sport and winning more often... I completely doubt that wearing red has any significant change. When I see someone wearing red I don't get distracted or psychologically messed up. I'll leave that to the bulls.
