By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
twintail said:

sc94597 said:

Why? SEGA gets licensing fees either way, except in the case of exclusivity Nintendo pays for the game's development. Seems like wishful thinking. 

Really? licensing fees as opposed to potential profits? Latter is more lucrative. 

Only when the opportunity costs of development are low. Obviously Sega's cost-benefit-risk analysis for Bayonetta 2 was contrary to your claim "latter is more lucrative."