| Aeolus451 said: I don't need to offer any suggestions because that has nothing to do with my points and I never gave the impression that I would offer any suggestion. That's a just distraction. I only said that 32 gb of storage is not good enough for a 9th gen console when it can't play 7th gen games without needing a micro SD card just to play games. You don't know what it would cost for an SKU with better storage so stop pretending that you know specific costs. You don't lose shit with SKUs being available with better hardware so please stop being stubborn for the sake of it. Some of you said the same sort of thing when people said that the wii u lacked HD space and that it should offer SKUs with more storage. It's amazing the amount of resistance some of ya give over common sense features being suggested on a nintendo console. |
Actually you do need to offer suggestions because your argument hinges on it being possible otherwise you're accepting that stance has a glaring hole in it, Wii U also didn't have mandatory installs and had the option for external HDDs up to 3TB. We do know what it can cost because similar portable devices have high prices as a result of the same components right now it's not me being stubborn it's you being defeated and trying to side step what you have no response to and I'll keep highlighting it while you try to keep up this little notion.
The irony of your common sense argument is that it's better to use universal micro sd cards like Miyamoto said then jack up the costs and battle Apple, Samsung etc... for the same components. The cards are easy to find, cheap and drop in price quicker and it removes the need for SKUs adding to consumer confusion, for reference someone else was suggesting 64GB adds about 50 quid more to the price a 32GB MSD costs 10 quid giving you 64GB for 40 quid less than if it was included.
