By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aeolus451 said:
Wyrdness said:

How is cost a terrible excuse? Internal flash memory for portable devices is expensive it's one reason iPhones cost around 800 quid plus and they don't have anywhere near what non portable devices have, you can't put HDDs in portable devices mate and incase you haven't noticed Switch has a portable form factor. Are you willing to pay 400-500 quid for a switch with more memory?

They can still expand it without it costing a fortune. It's not exactly small as a iphone. Perhaps they can be little innovative on that front. All I'm saying is that 32 GB is not enough to play alot of 3rd party games on the NS and that will likely turn off 3rd party devs. It woudn't hurt for nintendo to create another sku to offset it. Doesn't nintendo offer more than one sku on their consoles? Then why are some of you so against the idea of a common sense fix. I'm not saying that nintendo should replace all sku with the upgraded option. 

The break down of the Switch shows the is no space in the device, you've offered no alternative way to increase storage with out significantly increasing costs yet still harp on about they can do it. Here's a news flash for you they've given owners an option for more storage it's called micro SD cards and they're cheaper than adding internal flash storage to the point you can buy one and the Switch for cheaper than if the Switch had more internal flash storage.

Fact is it's not being against more storage it's realizing the trade off for it you've refused to answer whether you'd pay 100-110 quid more for a Switch because you know you and most consumers wouldn't as it would be at an obscene price.