Teeqoz on 11 September 2017
| Ka-pi96 said: Not sure I fully understand what you're talking about. The liberty one sounds alright though, although I would instead say an action is moral only if it doesn't (directly) harm another person (physically or financially but NOT emotionally). Not a huge change, but one I deem necessary considering the vagueness of "respecting one's liberty". |
So bullying and emotional abuse is moral? Death threats? 
