By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Goodnightmoon on 09 September 2017
Edit Thread
Pemalite said:
sc94597 said:

But not handhelds, which is what the Switch is when it is running at that resolution. What's impressive is how they hide the aliasing at that resolution so much that it was difficult for DF to count the pixels.

Doesn't matter if it is a Handheld or not. The Switch is orders-of-magnitude faster than a console from 2002.

This game is not even High-Definition which for me is simply unacceptable. - And it still gets performance drops on top of it.
Now docked... I am happy with a 900P resolution, that's great and is probably better than what I would expect considering handheld mode it is not even HD.

For God sake, Digital Foundry, experts on this, are praising the game to the heavens and you come acting like that wasn't enough for your superior standars and saying that it looks like a game from 2002, no it doesn't, those graphics at 600p with good antialiasing on a 6.2" screen looks completely awesome, probably better than 900p or even 1080p on a big screen, and those drops are rare, doesn't affect the gameplay experience at all because of the nature of the game and they may be patched on the future, so it just feels like you want to be negative, why don't you take a look to the extremelly fast and rare loading times, which will affect your gameplay WAY more than minor drops on a turn based strategy game?