By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aeolus451 said:
Nautilus said:

Just pointing out that the same way that he doesnt have a "source" for what he claims, you also dont have a source for what you claim.Where is a source for carts being more expensive, or rather being more expensive to the point of increasing the price by 10 dollars?

Personally, I dont think carts are that much expensive to bring up this difference to begin with, especially with 16 GB carts.One of these days Im gonna do a research on this topic so we can all do a concenssus.

"According to Eurogamer, Switch cards come in a wide range of capacities - 1GB, 2GB, 4GB, 8GB, 16GB and 32GB - and as you might imagine, the larger the size, the more the card costs to physically make."

http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2017/03/heres_why_nintendo_switch_games_cost_more_than_those_for_other_consoles

Here's is the article he was referring to. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2017-03-10-why-nintendo-switch-games-are-ending-up-more-expensive

At least I have some sort of source on this. Most on here are just lowballing the costs to $2 to 3 instead of the full difference because they rather try to paint 3rd party devs as being greedy so they jacked up the price for profit increases instead of the asisinine format just making the games cost more. 

I am not arguing over if carts are more expensive.They are.I am asking if you have something that indicates that this price difference will result in a bump of 10 dollars in the final product.Mind you, I also think that people throwing around random numbers is a moot point, because they are not precise(even though in most cases those numbers are just to exemplify, not to be hard facts), but accusing people of not having proof, when you yourself have no proof either is hypocrite in my opinion.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1