Kerotan said:
Miyamotoo said:
No, actually you are again ignoring facts, power is not what selling Nintendo hardware, and reason why 3DS didnt sold at launch because it has $250 price point, and bigger power usually means bigger price point and Nintendo always had more affordable price point of their hardware. Vita was way more powerful than 3DS and failed. Its hard to talk what would be if Wii U didn't exist, or if 3DS would stronger and much more expensive, but fact is that 3DS needed huge price cut to $170 to start selling.
Again you are wrong, depite point its one unifeded platform, Switch is still one platform not two platforms. Wii U and 3DS are two totally different platforms, they are two totally different consoles, two totally different price points, they had two different versions and revisons (well Wii U didnt becuse failed and had shorter life, but 3DS had 6 of them), they had two lineups of games, they had two separate brands, they had two two separates marketing...but despite fact that Switch is a hybrid device, it will have just one all those things so definatly its not best comparision Wii U + 3DS. Especially because Switch doesn't need to have sales of 3DS + Wii U to be considered for success, Switch can easily sell much less and yet to bring Nintendo much bigger profit, beacuse Switch is selling from launch with profit compared to Wii U and 3DS.
Switch doesn't have price point of handheld and has price point similar like Nintendo home console and thats fact, but it doesn't need to have price point like either or it can have price point like either, it doesn't really matters, it has price like it is and I agree that $300 for Switch and value Switch offers is pretty good.
|
Why do you keep ignoring what I say? I had to stop reading after the first sentence because you refuse to actually read what I say. I was saying power is one of the reasons why Switch sells. Do you think if switch was weak ass hardware like the vita it would have the same demand? Or if it was portable only? I doubt it.
My point was if 3DS was much more powerful, I didn't say much more expensive. If 3DS was a powerhouse hybrid and had the Wii U games library it would have done so much better. Instead it was a weak handheld only and therefore didn't give the consumer good value at that launch price point.
Now if you'd like to actually read what I say I'll have no problem doing likewise. Other wise you're wasting your time writing long replies.
|
Lol, but I answered to you on that, power is not what is selling Nintendo hardware, stronger 3DS with higher price point wouldnt sell better. No, you were saying that more powerful 3DS would sell better. If Switch is powerful like Vita it couldn't really work like home console, Switch has enuf power that can run like solid hybrid devaice, and people buying Switch beacuse has great value like hybrid devaice.
But greater power comes with higher price point. Again, Its hard to talk what would be if Wii U didn't exist, or if 3DS would stronger and much more expensive, talk like that is totaly pointless. But fact is that 3DS needed huge price cut to $170 to start selling, and that 3DS killed Vita in sales despite Vita was much stronger.
I read everything you wrote and I answered on every single your point, but like usual you are one that keep ignoring clear facts.
