Would you agree on a pre-emptive strike against North Korea?

[Aeolus451]

CaptainExplosion said:

Aeolus451 said:

He threatened people so much with it that everyone knows he's not going to use it. Attacking NK on the pretense that he's gonna use it so we have to attack him first is laughable. If WW3 starts and billions of people die because we attacked a country because it's leader who has a long history of bluffing, that's far worse than the second Iraq war. If we're gonna potentially kill millions, I'd rather be in the right or have legit excuse for it. 

He has a ready and working hydrogen bomb, which is a legitamate threat.

It's not a threat if it's not gonna be used. Someone having a weapon is not good enough reason to take them down. It's their willingness to use it in the wrong way that makes a weapon a threat to us. He's shown over and over again that he's a boy that cries wolf.