Would you agree on a pre-emptive strike against North Korea?

[Zkuq]

CaptainExplosion said:

Zkuq said:
As soon as the US is the country to suffer the most from the war, go ahead. Obviously I'm excluding North Korea, and it should also be obvious that such a war is highly undesirable if it has a reasonable chance of further escalation (in practice, this means with China or Russia).

Well what do you propose we do, nothing? We're running out of time here.

South Korea and possibly Japan would take most of the damage caused by the war - a war started by the US, mainly because of its own foreign interests. There's no need to do anything because North Korea isn't going to do anything unprovoked. The moment North Korea uses a nuclear weapon, the regime is done for. North Korea can use a nuclear weapon only as a deterrent and nothing else. As much as North Korea sucks, it's not much of a threat. It might become one to South Korea if South Korea is left to stand alone, but right now, it's not happening.