| DélioPT said: How GBA reaching HW and SW levels as fast as it did when compared to 3DS or 3DS+Vita, isn't relevant? |
It's not relevant because as the market goes this gen has surpassed that one in total units sold it's like saying one athlete got to the halfway point faster despite the other crossing the finish line first, it's null and void, if you tak the 15m away from the GBA like you say it falls below the 67m of the 3DS :/. GBA's time was during a monopoly and no mobile, today's era had competition and mobile yet still beat that gen out in total units moved.
Those are some of the titles I've named and along with the first party titles the library will do just that.
Nintendo also said DS is not a GBA successor you know why? Because that's known as PR, did the DS replace the GBA? Yes, you know why? Because PR plays to consumers much like a politician plays to the voter and Nintendo said NX at the time is not a traditional successor to both platforms, Nintendo markets it as a console as part of PR to have console premium prices for a portable device and that's what it comes down to.







