| Jaicee said: Well as the self-respecting feminist woman on this message board (just to reassert my distinctive credentials there ;) ), for me a feminist movie isn't simply one that stars a female character in the kind of role we more often see male characters in, like an action-hero role, for instance. That's not really enough to makes something a feminist movie for me. When I think of the term "feminist movie", I think of a movie that thematically revolves around, or at least substantially includes, advocacy for the advancement of women. Is it an advocacy movie to one or another degree, in other words? Let me clarify with some (relatively) big-name examples from recent years: Anyway, as to the matter of idealization, I firmly believe that movies starring Gal Gadot and ones starring Melissa McCarthy can coexist in the same world without terribly diminishing each other. And as to the quality of Patty Jenkins' movie versus James Cameron's pictures...well I would just point out that the latter are not exactly all masterpieces, frankly, and that Wonder Woman, by any reasonable definition, qualifies as an above-average picture artistically, especially for its genre. And I don't mind Wonder Woman having some minor flaws. It's still too fun for me not to really, really enjoy! :) |
I'm almost offended that I tried to make a substanent nuanced comment that had almost nothing to do with feminism(an area I was actually trying to avoid) ... and the response I get is "this is what a feminist movie really is..."
I don't really care if it's feminist or not. All I said in my original comment was I wasn't a feminist. I didn't really talk about feminism much at all. I even said that Wonder Woman isn't really progressing anything as a film, and gave a much more nuanced answer to what possible progressive effect it could have. I can't say I really care about labels.
Also, Mad Max, and for the most part Ghostbusters, were not feminist films.







