Aeolus451 said:
I don't think anyone is saying a person can't create their own version but if a person doesn't understand and appreciate the source material they are using for their recreation in the first place then they'll just pervert it or twist it even if they use good actors in it or have a large budget. It's like a slap to the face to the fans and original creattor(s) when people do that. I'm fine with people using a popular IP to make some money but they can do it in a way that's appreciative of it and pays homage to it. If they don't then it seems they're just using the IP in name only to make a buck or using it to spead some message. |
Yep I don't disagree with that. I was just adressing the part where the person literally said
| "Not surprising. When directors/writers/producers set off to make their own version of an established frachise, things always end in disaster." |
Which I don't think is fair, as long as it respects and understands the source material. Anyways, i'm not defending this piece of trash movie.
