By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 on 20 August 2017
Edit Thread
Qwark said:
curl-6 said:

I understand the why of why it looks so dated, it's a port from a vastly weaker system. But that doesn't give it a free pass in my book. They shouldn't have even made this frankly, they should have either ported Monster Hunter World or made a ground-up Switch Monster Hunter instead.

You are totally missing the point of this game. It's to make a shot ton of money for minimal costs with very little risk since it bears the monster hunter name. They could remake the whole game, but would that have a big enough effect on total sales to cover those costs. Or is it smarter to release a somewhat decent 3ds port on the Switch and work on the next MH for Switch after, while the former makes enough money to develop that game.

Oh I get that it works out fine for Capcom to do a low effort cash grab, I'm coming more from the point of view of a consumer who wants quality products. Capcom do far too much of this nowadays, pumping out poor quality software to make a quick buck.