Wyrdness on 17 August 2017
| fatslob-:O said: Gamevice need not prove that Nintendo directly infringed on their patent ... They only need to prove that contributory infringement of patents has occured ... Just because the defendant stepped on 1 of the 10 defined functions in a plaintiff's patent doesn't mean that the defendent didn't infringe on the patent ... |
???
Contributory infringement would require that Nintendo induced or made someone else directly infringe the patent what are you on about here exactly? That's even harder for Gamevice.
