Insidb said:
I agree; things really have to shake out on what Nintendo is granted, etc. Any good lawyer would hopefully say that Ninendo cost them the greater marker: "that would have been us," etc. I guess they could argue that the damages are the sales differential. which would seem to be the most sensible approach here. |
Issue is, the Wikipad - which is the patent they seem to be referencing predominently - went out of sale in 2013. Well before the Switch hit market. And they said themselves, in a public statement, that the new Gamevice detatchable controllers would not have raised the needed 12 mil to begin development without the Switch's influence on the market. These events create a very clear scenario here where without the Switch, they wouldn't have a market. When it comes to damages, that would be my argument if I were Nintendo. They had their shot without the Switch and accomplished nothing, then the Switch came along and NOW they have a shot with their new product. It's the opposite of damages. And use their own words to back it up.