In theory: Treasure Tracker 2 using the Odyssey engine, thoughts?

[Nautilus]

friendlyfamine said:

Nautilus said:

It sold much more than one million, and it was a game that was reusing assets from Super Mario World, which was a game that already had the whole concept of Captain Toad locked down....

1.32 million or something. I suppose that's "decent" for the Wii U, but honestly, Treasure Tracker was pretty forgettable. It's not until this thread that I was reminded of that game's existence. It doesn't seem to be a requested game by any means that will help push system sales. No need for everything to have a sequel tbh. Nintendo should prioritize original titles like ARMS and Splatoon. ARMS did very well for a full-priced fighting game.

I havent played the game yet and I plan to play it sometime by the end of february.But if I remember correctly, Nintendo once said that, for its big budget games, usually 2 million units was enough to pull in significant profits.Treasure Tracker is obviosly a very low budget game, seeing that it reuses many assets from Super Mario 3D World and the game concept was already in that game.This is a game that selling 300 K would probably be considered a sucess, especially since Treasure Tracker had the feeling to be more of a experimental game and a fun side project for Nintendo.

Now, wether it was forgetable or not, I cant say since I never played.But if the game is as good as the few stages that were in Super Mario 3D World, and if its as good as people say, it would be a nice addition to the Switch.And a game that could be made in less than 2 years, and by a very small team.