| Dravenet7 said: Too hard for you to go back and read the previous sentence, eh? For me to be in denial post less than half of what I said in 5 posts and claim that was my only point. Oh wait... You can claim I'm feigning ignorance or prove it by quoting the full paragraph to prove that it wasn't an interpretation, but you won't because you can't. And there is no false equivilancy != I claim you made a false equivilancy. How the hell did you get this? Actually nevermind. If anyone follows this string of posts, its made quite clear that I proved my points and backed them up, and you made allegations you can't prove a single one. Enjoy mulling that over. |
I don't care about your interpretation of what Azuren said, it's the claims that you raised up ...
And you're the one who made the false equivalencies by trying to reinterpret my arguments only to be shit up with your naive simplification ...
It's hilarious how you jump to claim conclusion, that's the behaviour you see from an internet strongman ...
Good day to you on fabricating my arugments then denying a statement that you made ... 
