Activision: Destiny 2 DLC could be as important as the Base game

[oniyide]

Neodegenerate said:

Nautilus said:

That one you are paying for a lot of content with a fair price, and the other that you are paying for something that is not worth the price being asked?

Mario Kart 8 and The Witcher 3 DLC price was 20 dollars I believe but they added so much to the game.MK 8 added about 50% more content to the game, and the Witcher 3 was a 40 hours adventure(give or take), with this added content being of a very high quality.(Mind you that the main agme was around 70 hours of so playing normaly)

As for Destiny, it was the complete oposite.It was extremely expensive, and each expansion didnt add alot of content.Thats why people are pissed.

Sounds to me like you didn't play the Taken King or Rise of Iron pieces.  The first two DLCs, the 15 bucks a piece ones, were pretty bad.  However, Destiny has been supported and given high quality DLC for the past 2 years.  On top of that, they have rolled out rather consistent quarterly updates to the game in years 2 and 3.  

 

I don't know what kind of games everyone complaining about the price in this thread are playing, but Destiny is the only game I have bought this gen that has kept me going back to it for 3 FULL years.  I paid roughly 120 bucks for that by buying everything as it came out.  To me that isn't a lot of money for the amount of time and content I got.  Too many are basing Destiny's DLC practice on year 1, which is when they were honing and perfecting the practice.

And people think 120 is too much. Thats essentially paying twice the amount of money for a game. But if you are happy thats all that matters. I have all the DLC and the only one worth a damn was Taken King, Rise of Iron was way too short for how much it cost. And locking content because you dont have the latest version is crap. Imagine if COD locked modes if you didnt buy the DLC