Ka-pi96 said:
As did he. She didn`t force him in to anything. He could have chose not to do it and/or to cease contact with her at any point but didn`t. |
At that precise moment he was hesitant to kill himself, she made a choice. She could have did nothing, talked him out of it or chose to goad him into ending his life. At that moment her choice and her action using her influence and her status pushed the situation to death. It really does not matter if you think someone can or cannot choose to end their life, but in the majority of states it’s still a crime and even in the ones that allow it there are procedures a person has to go through in order to commit the act or it’s a crime. Just like any crime you can be a assessor to that crime.
So if we think of this like any other crime, if this guy was a bank robber, and he needed intel of on the bank to make his heist. The person giving that info for the heist knowing the end result and outcome would be sentenced and prosecuted as an assessor to the act. Just because you are ignorant that something is a crime does not mean you are absolved.
The only reason she did not get voluntary Manslaughter is just her fortune of not being their to assist or give him the instrument to kill himself.








