| Aeolus451 said: The problem here is that you can't read worth shit. Reread what I wrote slowly then reply and perhaps we can continue this discussion. If not I'm done with repeating myself over and over. Did you not look at the sources in article? I guess not. Of course, you wouldn't be asking that question about the sample size. |
No it's more that you can't write for shit someone else as well has also highlighted this problem with a few of your posts.
I also did look at the sources of the article, the source that gave that part you're touting doesn't answer that question hence why I'm point that out, the source leads to a PDF by the ESA that just has the percentages and note you don't even have a response to the odd percents in themselves with the stats not adding up to an coherant overall %. Well at least not coherant in the context you're trying to use them by looking at the source it looks that it's not saying portables are only 17% of the market at all but the devices that get the most use among gamers which ironically calls into question your reading of the data.
