By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 03 August 2017
Edit Thread
OTBWY said:
DonFerrari said:

So a leaker said Sony paid to remove the game from Switch but Sony couldn't be bothered to request full exclusivity? Seems legit.

Paying for port sure exist, but you are just making air.

Is it so out of the realm of reality for you that Sony, a giant conglomerate corporation, wouldn't do such a thing? Why should I doubt when evidence has shown that Sony will try to disadvantage the competition? I mean, even Nintendo did the same thing back in the day.

It isn't out of realm of reality.

It's just that you affirmed with conviction so I'm asking for evidence, because blocking only nintendo and paying for it doesn't make sense.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."