Turkish said:
Because you can't tell me what you're arguing with me about. You've never clarified it, all you did was "I didnt say that", "you misinterpreted me".
|
You're trying to take me to task and have me own up to things you believe I said. How can I do that when I didn't say them? You act like I'm ignoring your argument, but when your argument is based off a false pretence, then there's nothing for me to actually refute is there?
Let's go back to that quote I made about the burden of proof.
"When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo."
You made the claim. I disputed it. I disputed it by saying I believe It would cost more to produce than an NES classic type of device so it doesn't make sense for Sony to make it because I don't think there'd be enough people willing to pay a premium for such a device. There mere fact that you suggested that Sony could manufacture and sell this for $99-$149 means that you be in agreement with me that you think it would cost more to produce than the $59 NES classic. So what's the problem?
Somehow someway you've turned me saying "it would cost more to produce than an NES classic" to "[your] idea is too costly and Nintendo's solution is the only way" which is completely hyperbolic nonsense, and now you're obsessing over it as if I'm lying.
So here we are, are you actually going to support your claim that Sony can manufacture and sell this PS1 classic you proprosed for $99-$149?
