Climatologists deny existence Donald Trump

[ArchangelMadzz]

irstupid said:

ArchangelMadzz said:

1. Movies are bullshit. Estimates change with new data.

2. That's literally every scientist.

3. You can research their data and measurement methods. Multiple different organisations across the world that study and measure climate arrive at similar data. Different measurement methods provide different accuracy in results. If I weigh myself with someone guessing, mechanical scale, an electronic scale and an atomic scale they will all be different results that's how measurement tools work. 

1. My movie comparison was just an example. Scientists have come out and said many times when stuff (Noah's arc type stuff) is supposed to happen and hasn't even come close.

2. Thus why point 3 is so relevant

3. That is my point. Climate scientists hide that data. They don't let us see which instruments they used, which data they threw out, which they kept, ect. Science should be transparent. If it isn't, it's not to be trusted, imo.

 

Basically what I'm saying is, I will listen to the scientists solution. Don't pollute, cut down my private jet time, bike if I can, ect. to save the world. Or just make it a better place. But I don't trust/believe their diagnosis. I feel like they are telling me I have terminal cancer of the brain when my head hurts. I could have terminal cancer of the brain, or I could just have a headache/fever. I need to see my mri/cat/ect scan showing my cancer before I trust them. I am not going to just take their word for it and read a pamphlet telling me about my "cancer"

1. Most of these predictions have been from politicians pushing an agenda. Scientists are very conservative with their estimates. 

2/3. Science is very transparent, the research documents methodology and reports are published in scientific journals available for you to read. It's just most people don't want to because they are long. Or don't have a climatology degree to assess.