Critics and Moviegoers are so wrong about Dunkirk- Boring Snorefest that only keeps you awake because you expect a Nolan movie to be awesome- Sooo many spoilers!!!

[Nogamez]

spurgeonryan said:

Nogamez said:

I enjoyed it for what it was. Didn't find it boring. I mean just because nearly everyone else likes it doesn't mean you have to.

 

Also I mean that's kinda how it played out in real life. except there was alot more aerial combat amongst Luftwaffe and RAF. The British lost around 70,000 soldiers in that campaign rescued 340,000 hence why we british see it as a Victory, or at least celebrate the fact that civilians and everyday people came to their rescue in their hour of need.

I feel the only reason it was not boring was because I was there waiting for something spectacular to happen.  I kept saying to myself,  "OK,  good this is OK,  now let's get to... Ahhh this is fine... Ooooooh more perfectly OK stuff,  now I would like to see fuck Hardy was taken prisoner and probably murdered. 

 

The end. No theater clapping,  no man I hate the Germans back then,  no thinking they finally made it,  just over.  Thank you for the popcorn

My Grandfather was a British soldier mate, and was captured after he was airdropped the day before D-day from a RAF glider, which was shot down, he was taken to a POW camp, his wife my Grandma was told he died, a year later he was liberated by the Americans or British can't remember, but he survived and wasn't murdered by the Germans. He did get rifle butted so hard that he had kidney problem for the rest of his life though. Anyways I'm rambling, point was, Germans didn't murder allied POW's often.