By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nuvendil said:
Volterra_90 said:
I went to see it, and I liked it. But I don't think it was something so... great. I mean, it must be my least favourite Nolan film, so I've been expecting way more of it. It was reeeeally boring at times. But I must say that there are some scenes which are insanely intense and nerve-wracking. 7/10 would be my score. I think it's really overrated, and I'm saying this as a self-declared Nolan fan.

Wonder if this will be the response of many Nolan fans.  From all descriptions it's way outside his usual comfort zone, since Nolan is very much a theme-centered writer with a focus on dialogue character development paired with excellent cinematography, and only 1 of those 3 seems to be in Dunkirk.

I'll probably like it a lot as not only a Nolan guy but more importantly a big fan of old school war films. 

It's definitely different from anything I've seen from him, that's for sure. But it's also different from any war movie I've seen. It's an almost silent movie at times, with almost no dialogue through the movie. It's really beautifully directed and the score is fantastic, adding to the tension. But I was really bored at times, there were a lot of long shots where almost anything happens. I hate that in films. If the movie was half an hour shorter, I'd probably enjoy it way more.