By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Aeolus451 on 20 July 2017
Edit Thread
LudicrousSpeed said:
ArchangelMadzz said:

This is Nintendo's 3rd try at a gaming network. This gen is Sony's second try. 

 

Also PSN was free on PS3 and voice chat in games was enabled. And on PS4 party chat is a free feature so you can't use the price argument.

 

Nintendo has skilled engineers and designers and programmers, there's no reason why they couldn't do built in party chat.

Nintendo has been at this for like, 5 years now. Counting the DS/Wii WiFi Service, whatever it was called, would be like including whatever Sony had going for PS2.

I don't care about party chat in PS4 being free, it's irrelevant to anything I said. I'm talking overall price and the expectations that come with that price. I don't expect Nintendo to have as robust or quality a network as MicroSony when their service costs $20 for an entire year. Again, it's the same logic we saw on this board last gen when PSN lacked many features and qualities Live had. "well it's free".

Lastly the app and services aren't even finished yet, it's not launching as a complete service until next year. This will be my last post here, no point bickering about what is basically a beta LOL.

Nintendo should of had a decent voice chat for the wii and onward.  No excuses. Online games were becoming very popular and a blind man could see that trend. Voice chat makes it alot easier to communicate in those games and most people who play those games want voice chat. That's a fact.