Aeolus451 said:
You're misundering the meaning of SJW if you're equating it to Ghandi or MLK. You're basically insulting them by comparing them to the likes of Anita Sarkeesian or Micheal Moore. I'm all for people being treated as equals in every sense of that saying but I'm not okay with SJWs pushing things like culture appropriation or that black people can't be racist. That kind of shit is regressive. |
Whitr privelege is one if the most racist popular things produced by SJW. Surely that's not what Jezus intended by treating people as equals. Nor anything which will be approved by MLK since he wanted black and white to live among eachother and connect eith eachother as equal and not to act passive aggressive towards eachother behind a monitor.
Same goes for comparing 1st wave feminists with 3rd wave feminism in the western world not liking the entire idea of equalitarinism and are offended by people who think that sex should be entire irrelevant on how to treat any human being. Which makes you a mans right activist these days. A fun example of that is a British politician who wanted to introduce a man's day to talk about problems man face in today's society, higher dropout rates, suicide counts etc. The mere idea was offending for a clearly feminist politician which just laughed at the man as if he where a moron. I think most first wave feminist would litteraly be ashamed of this woman as for the picture this movement creates about man being all inherently potential myogenic sexists and all man being the enemy of woman and feminism in general.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=737U7YbMqOI
Please excuse my (probally) poor grammar







