caffeinade said:
1. A thread about future tech, talks about stuff that is not yet announced... 2. That is a professional screen, it has a very high markup (and early adopters tax) and has been professionally colour calibrated (as well as some cool pro features). 3. I am well aware of the burn in problem, and my desktop does not have much static content, so I am fine. |
1. If it's a thread about future tech, maybe mention that somewhere and not begin discussing a purchase as though it is very nearly on the horizon.
2. I wouldn't count on stuff that is very clearly for rich enthusiasts and industrial use to go on sale, nor would I expect it to flip over to OLED in the process.
3. Your computer screen is, at any point in time when not full-screened on a movie or game, is more than 80% static imagery. Your task bar, windows, the clock, icons, text- unless you are making a conscious effort to move them, they are static. Using an OLED for a gaming TV is risky, but using it as a monitor is downright irresponsible. And you are correct: QLED is currently not self-emitting. However, Samsung claims that they can make it happen, and plan on making that a reality within the next few years (hence that word "wait"). A more apt analogy would be me suggesting you wait to adopt a healthy bear rather than adopt a bear with crippling birth defects right now. But since this is "future" tech discussion, I suppose it would mean you're just consciously picking the lower-tier TV because you're uneducated on the subject.
Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!
Check out my Twitch Channel!:
www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames